1. Webster MA. Adaptation and visual coding. J Vis. 2011;11[3]:1–23. [Google Scholar]
2. Clifford CW, Webster MA, Stanley GB, Stocker AA, Kohn A, Sharpee TO, Schwartz O. Visual adaptation: neural, psychological and computational aspects. Vision Research. 2007;47:3125–31. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.023. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Gibson JJ, Radner M. Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1937;20:453–67. doi: 10.1037/h0059826. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Wohlgemuth A. On the aftereffect of seen movement. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplement. 1911;1:1–117. [Google Scholar]
5. Stockman A, Langendorfer M, Smithson HE, Sharpe LT. Human cone light adaptation: from behavioral measurements to molecular mechanisms. J Vis. 2006;6:1194–213. doi: 10.1167/6.11.5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/717960368
6. Graham NV. Visual Pattern Analyzers. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol. 1968;195:215–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Blake R, Overton R, Lema-Stern S. Interocular transfer of visual aftereffects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981;7:367–81. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.7.2.367. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1991;1:1–47. doi: 10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Clifford CWG, Rhodes G. Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High-Level Vision, Advances in Visual Cognition Series, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
11. Leopold DA, O'Toole AJ, Vetter T, Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience. 2001;4:89–94. doi: 10.1038/82947. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/717960369
12. Webster MA, Kaping D, Mizokami Y, Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature. 2004;428:557–61. doi: 10.1038/nature02420. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Jordan H, Fallah M, Stoner GR. Adaptation of gender derived from biological motion. Nature Neuroscience. 2006;9:738–9. doi: 10.1038/nn1710. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Troje NF, Sadr J, Geyer H, Nakayama K. Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. Journal of Vision. 2006;6:850–7. doi: 10.1167/6.8.7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Fang F, He S. Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron. 2005;45:793–800. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.037. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/717960370
16. Greene MR, Oliva A. High-level aftereffects to global scene properties. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010;36:1430–42. doi: 10.1037/a0019058. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/717960371
17. Motoyoshi I, Nishida S, Sharan L, Adelson EH. Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature. 2007;447:206–9. doi: 10.1038/nature05724. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Suzuki S. High-level pattern coding revealed by brief shape aftereffects. In: Clifford C, Rhodes G, editors. Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High-Level Vision, Advances in Visual Cognition Series, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
20. Webster MA, MacLeod DIA. Visual adaptation and face perception. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366:1702–25. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0360. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Clifford CWG. Perceptual adaptation: motion parallels orientation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2002;6:136–43. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613[00]01856-8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Kohn A, Movshon JA. Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque. Neuron. 2003;39:681–91. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273[03]00438-0. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/1022271
24. Xu H, Dayan P, Lipkin RM, Qian N. Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: Low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgments. Journal of Neuroscience. 2008;28:3374–83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0182-08.2008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Dickinson JE, Almeida RA, Bell J, Badcock DR. Global shape aftereffects have a local substrate: A tilt aftereffect field. J Vis. 2010;10:5. doi: 10.1167/10.13.5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Olveczky BP, Baccus SA, Meister M. Retinal adaptation to object motion. Neuron. 2007;56:689–700. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.030. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Chubb C, Sperling G, Solomon JA. Texture interactions determine perceived contrast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:9631–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9631. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Afraz A, Cavanagh P. The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations. Journal of Vision. 2009;9[10]:11–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Watson TL, Clifford CWG. Pulling faces: An investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect. Perception. 2003;32:1109–16. doi: 10.1068/p5082. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/717960374
32. Ghuman AS, McDaniel JR, Martin A. Face Adaptation without a Face. Current Biology. 2010;20:32–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.077. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Winawer J, Huk AC, Boroditsky L. A motion aftereffect from still photographs depicting motion. Psychol Sci. 2008;19:276–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02080.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/717960375
34. Dils AT, Boroditsky L. Visual motion aftereffect from understanding motion language. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:16396–400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009438107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Bestelmeyer PEG, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Perrett DI, Schneider A, Welling LLM, Conway CA. Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. Cognition. 2008;107:353–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Rotshtein P, Henson RN, Treves A, Driver J, Dolan RJ. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience. 2005;8:107–13. doi: 10.1038/nn1370. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/1023211
37. Moradi F, Koch C, Shimojo S. Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron. 2005;45:169–75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. He D, Kersten D, Fang F. Opposite modulation of high- and low-level visual aftereffects by perceptual grouping. Current Biology. 2012;22:1040–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.026. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Valentine T, Endo M. Towards an exemplar model of face processing: the effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 1992;44:671–703. doi: 10.1080/14640749208401305. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Blakemore C, Campbell FW. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology. 1969;203:237–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Webster MA. Human colour perception and its adaptation. Network: Computation in Neural Systems. 1996;7:587–634. doi: 10.1088/0954-898X/7/4/002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Rhodes G, Robbins R, Jaquet E, McKone E, Jeffery L, Clifford CWG. Adaptation and face perception - how aftereffects implicate norm based coding of faces. In: Clifford CWG, Rhodes G, editors. Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High-Level Vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 213–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
44. Robbins R, McKone E, Edwards M. Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: Adapter position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance. 2007;33:570–92. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.570. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Rhodes G, Jeffery L. Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research. 2006;46:2977–87. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
46. Webster MA, MacLin OH. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1999;6:647–53. doi: 10.3758/BF03212974. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
47. Zhao C, Series P, Hancock PJ, Bednar JA. Similar neural adaptation mechanisms underlying face gender and tilt aftereffects. Vision Res. 2011;51:2021–30. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.014. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
48. Storrs KH, Arnold DK. Not all face aftereffects are equal. Vision Research. in press. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Hegde J. How reliable is the pattern adaptation technique? A modeling study. J Neurophysiol. 2009;102:2245–52. doi: 10.1152/jn.00216.2009. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/6535957
50. Mur M, Ruff DA, Bodurka J, Bandettini PA, Kriegeskorte N. Face-identity change activation outside the face system: “release from adaptation” may not always indicate neuronal selectivity. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:2027–42. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp272. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Barlow HB. A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual aftereffects. In: Blakemore C, editor. Visual Coding and Efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. pp. 363–75. [Google Scholar]
52. Elliott SL, Georgeson MA, Webster MA. Response normalization and blur adaptation: Data and multi-scale model. J Vis. 2011;11 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Kohn A. Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:3155–64. doi: 10.1152/jn.00086.2007. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
54. Chopin A, Mamassian P. Predictive properties of visual adaptation. Curr Biol. 22:622–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.021. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Ohzawa I, Sclar G, Freeman RD. Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex. Nature. 1982;298:266–8. doi: 10.1038/298266a0. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Greenlee MW, Heitger F. The functional role of contrast adaptation. Vision Res. 1988;28:791–7. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989[88]90026-0. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
57. McDermott KC, Malkoc G, Mulligan JB, Webster MA. Adaptation and visual salience. J Vis. 2010;10:17. doi: 10.1167/10.13.17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Ranganath C, Rainer G. Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:193–202. doi: 10.1038/nrn1052. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. Foster DH. Color constancy. Vision Res. 2011;51:674–700. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
60. Wark B, Lundstrom BN, Fairhall A. Sensory adaptation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007;17:423–9. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
61. Wainwright MJ. Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vision Res. 1999;39:3960–74. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989[99]00101-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Sharpee TO, Sugihara H, Kurgansky AV, Rebrik SP, Stryker MP, Miller KD. Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex. Nature. 2006;439:936–42. doi: 10.1038/nature04519. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/1031245
64. Rieke F, Rudd ME. The challenges natural images pose for visual adaptation. Neuron. 2009;64:605–16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.028. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
65. Srinivasan MV, Laughlin SB, Dubs A. Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982;216:427–59. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1982.0085. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/7433956
66. Simoncelli EP, Olshausen BA. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1193–216. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
67. Barlow HB, Macleod DI, van Meeteren A. Adaptation to gratings: no compensatory advantages found. Vision Research. 1976;16:1043–5. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989[76]90241-8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
68. Clifford CWG, Wyatt AM, Arnold DH, Smith ST, Wenderoth P. Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination. Vision Research. 2001;41:151–9. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989[00]00248-0. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
69. Westheimer G, Gee A. Orthogonal adaptation and orientation discrimination. Vision Research. 2002;42:2339–43. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989[02]00192-X. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
70. Rhodes G, Watson TL, Jeffery L, Clifford CW. Perceptual adaptation helps us identify faces. Vision Research. 2010;50:963–8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
71. Ng M, Boynton GM, Fine I. Face adaptation does not improve performance on search or discrimination tasks. Journal of Vision. 2008;8[1]:1–20. doi: 10.1167/8.1.1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
72. Armann R, Jeffery L, Calder AJ, Rhodes G. Race-specific norms for coding face identity and a functional role for norms. J Vis. 2011;11:9. doi: 10.1167/11.13.9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
73. Susilo T, McKone E, Edwards M. What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation. Vision Research. 2010;50:300–14. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.016. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
74. Dennett H, Susilo T, McKone E. Face aftereffects predict individual differences in face recognition ability. Psychological Science. in press. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76. Zhang P, Bao M, Kwon M, He S, Engel SA. Effects of orientation-specific visual deprivation induced with altered reality. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1956–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/717960379
78. Neitz J, Carroll J, Yamauchi Y, Neitz M, Williams DR. Color perception is mediated by a plastic neural mechanism that is adjustable in adults. Neuron. 2002;35:783–92. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273[02]00818-8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
79. Belmore SC, Shevell SK. Very-long-term and short-term chromatic adaptation: are their influences cumulative? Vision Res. 2010;51:362–6. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.011. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
80. Vul E, Krizay E, MacLeod DI. The McCollough effect reflects permanent and transient adaptation in early visual cortex. Journal of Vision. 2008;8[4]:1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81. Bao M, Engel SA. Distinct mechanism for long-term contrast adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:5898–903. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113503109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
83. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040179. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/1032119
84. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:89–108. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153135. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
86. Yehezkel O, Sagi D, Sterkin A, Belkin M, Polat U. Learning to adapt: Dynamics of readaptation to geometrical distortions. Vision Res. 2010;50:1550–8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.014. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] www.f1000.com/717960381
87. van Lier R, Vergeer M, Anstis S. Filling-in afterimage colors between the lines. Curr Biol. 2009;19:R323–4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]