So sánh 1603 và 1703 win 10 năm 2024
However if we do the same procedure but with a Windows 10 1703 image, the upgrade of our app fails with the following error:
The custom action above refers to a windows service which is being uninstalled and then reinstalled with the new update. I tried putting a stop service and even a stop process to see if that would work (possibly handles left open) and the installer still did not work. Any ideas why this is happening? asked Sep 20, 2017 at 19:37 The code in the custom action has crashed, I assume you know that. Without showing more of the log it's also not clear where in the upgrade it's happening, if in fact you're referring to a major upgrade when you say "update". In a major upgrade there's an install of the new product and an uninstall of the older one - where is this crash happening in that sequence? It's also possible that your ShopInstall class is an installer class to install a service, which isn't necessary because Windows Installer has ServiceInstall actions for that. Having said that, the message "The specified service has been marked for deletion" implies that the code is trying to do something to a disabled service. So it looks like a previous uninstall of the service has been attempted, and the service did not shut down or stop correctly. In that situation Windows will mark the service disabled and then a reboot will finally delete it. In the meantime if something tries to do something with that service it will fail with the "pending deletion" error. So you'd have to go back to whatever uninstall was attempted and why it failed to first stop, and then uninstall the service. I’m very thankful for the recent post about where to legally download Windows! My installation of Windows 10 “back in the day” stopped functioning correctly and I couldn’t do a repair install, likely due to a failing hard drive. My question please, is which version should I download and try again on a new hard drive? (a HDD, not a SSD) I definitely want to avoid 1803, it would seem. Should I get 1709, 1703, or go all the way back to 1607? I just want stability and safety. I very much appreciate all the update help here for how to avoid getting forced into the latest version of Win10. I appreciate everything here! Thank you so much in advance — SBS Windows 7 HP SP1 64-bit, Group B
MrJimPhelps AskWoody MVP Have you considered moving to Windows 8.1, and installing Classic Shell? After doing that, you can configure Classic Shell to make Windows 8.1 look and feel exactly like Windows 7, so much so that you may forget you are running 8.1. This will give you an additional three years of a supported, pre-Windows10 operating system. I am running Linux Mint, with Windows 8.1 running in a virtual machine for those rare instances when I am unable to perform a particular task in Linux. This setup works very well for me. If you have at least 8 GB of RAM and are running 64-bit Linux, Windows 8.1 will likely run so well that you won’t even notice that it is running in a virtual machine. Group "L" (Linux Mint) with Windows 8.1 running in a VM 1 user thanked author for this post. singbluesilver AskWoody Lounger I hadn’t thought of this! Interesting and innovative idea. Thank you for putting it out there. As for VM, I love the idea of toggling back and forth between Windows and a Linux distro, saving the hassle of frequent rebooting and choosing. But I’m a little light on memory for that: 4 GB, and it’s DDR2 so I can’t really upgrade. I have a shop-built computer that I got on a blowout a bit after DDR2 was phased out (which I didn’t know at the time). Has a good, fast processor for that era though, an Intel Core2 Quad 64-bit. At least that much would be in my favor for VM. Have you considered moving to Windows 8.1, and installing Classic Shell? After doing that, you can configure Classic Shell to make Windows 8.1 look and feel exactly like Windows 7, so much so that you may forget you are running 8.1. This will give you an additional three years of a supported, pre-Windows10 operating system. I am running Linux Mint, with Windows 8.1 running in a virtual machine for those rare instances when I am unable to perform a particular task in Linux. This setup works very well for me. If you have at least 8 GB of RAM and are running 64-bit Linux, Windows 8.1 will likely run so well that you won’t even notice that it is running in a virtual machine. Windows 7 HP SP1 64-bit, Group B zero2dash AskWoody Lounger I would have said 1703, but after my 1703 machines upgraded to 1709, I haven’t had any problems with it either. Both builds have been rock solid for me, on multiple configurations. Seems like 1703 is generally regarded as the “most stable” though, as 1709 has caused some problems for some users. (Not me, however.) 1 user thanked author for this post. singbluesilver AskWoody Lounger I apologize. My intent was only to give those reading and potentially responding more to go on as to which version(s) of Win7 I run, thus which version of Win10 I’d be upgrading to after somebody asked me Home vs Pro. I won’t talk about Win7 further, now that I’ve put the requested info out there. Please stay on topic. The topic is Win10 – not Win7/8.1 or Linux Windows 7 HP SP1 64-bit, Group B joep517 AskWoody MVP Age is not necessarily a good barometer of stability for an OS. Other than in the most general terms (i.e. patches released), Microsoft does not publish stability statistics. For instance, since 1703 is the oldest supported version IF it is getting fewer patches is that because it is now more stable or because there a much fewer people running it? How many patches have been released for 1703? To fix how many problems? At what rate were the patches released? When did they peak? How many people were really affected by the patched issues? I would consider a version less desirable if there was a problem which affected a large percentage of the user population rather than a version which had more individual problems but affected a smaller percentage overall. BTW, on the machines I support they are all on 1803 except my personal machine which runs the latest Insider Preview build. These machines have gone through each release since 1607. None had any particular problem updating to the release or running it. IMO, if you take reasonable care (i.e. make an image backup) before upgrading you’ll be fine. NOTE: For completeness – my machine has run every Insider Preview build since the program was started. In that time I had one build which I had a problem installing. That was cleared up in a few days by Microsoft. I’ve had two crashes of Win10 with all these builds. Yes, I’ve run into a few of the known issue along the way but nothing that made these early releases unusable. --Joe 2 users thanked author for this post. Anonymous Inactive Singbluesilver Windows 10 Pro version 1709 remained the prominent and most stable on all my machines, both AMD and Intel based. Driver stability and connectivity being the two most important issues. This version remained stable throughout the Spectre / Meltdown train wreck in which MS so terribly got their microcode incorrect, not having to roll back a single system. |