Good employee. HP's new ProBook 430 G4 is the entry-level business model. The Kaby Lake update leaves a good initial impression, but some details reveal that you are not on the executive floor yet.
For the original German review, see here.
HP is one of the first manufacturers to offer its business notebooks with Intel's new Kaby Lake processor generation. The devices from the ProBook series represent the entry into the business segment, followed by the much more expensive EliteBooks. Compared to consumer systems, business laptops have a bigger focus on security and good input devices.
Our review model today is the ProBook 430 G4. The 13.3-inch subnotebook is the smallest and most portable system. HP currently charges around 1,050 Euros [~$1101] for the configuration Y8B47EA with a modern Kaby Lake chip from Intel, 8 GB RAM, an IPS panel as well as a dual-storage system consisting of a 256 GB SDD and a 1 TB HDD.
The office devices from other big manufacturers like Dell and Lenovo were not updated yet, but we expect new systems in Q1 2017. We therefore use the following comparison devices for our article: Dell XPS 13 FHD, Lenovo ThinkPad 13 Ultrabook, Lenovo IdeaPad 710S and Acer Aspire S 13.
Memory
8 GB
, DDR4-2133, Single-Channel, 1/2 Slots free, up to 16 GB
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, LGD052D, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB
, + 1TB HDD [WD10SPCX, 5400 rpm], 1200 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Headset, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN [10/100/1000MBit/s], Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 [a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/], Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth [in mm]: 19.8 x 330 x 233.5 [ = 0.78 x 12.99 x 9.19 in]
Battery
48 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 cells, Battery runtime [according to manufacturer]: 16 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 45-Watt power adapter, HP Tools, Office 365 [trial], 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.577 kg [ = 55.63 oz / 3.48 pounds], Power Supply: 295 g [ = 10.41 oz / 0.65 pounds]
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Silver chassis with black elements – the ProBook 430 G4 is clearly an HP laptop. Contrary to the predecessor ProBook 430 G3, the lid is not black anymore, it is now also silver. The visual appearance is actually quite sophisticated and the system should feel at home in office environments.
HP uses a plastic chassis, only the top of the base unit was reinforced with aluminum and is also a bit cooler to touch. The stability is pretty good and even a lot of pressure can only dent the center area a bit, which is accompanied by quiet creaking sounds. The display is not that good, as it can easily be twisted and pressure will also result in ripples on the screen.
One new feature compared to the previous model is the hinges, because HP now uses a drop-down mechanism. They have a plastic cover and are pretty taut. The resistance is well-adjusted, and you can still open the lid with just one hand. The maximum opening angle is unfortunately still limited at around 130 degrees. On the bottom are two maintenance hatches for access to the memory and the storage drives; the battery cannot be replaced.
All in all, you get a solid chassis, which is a step above inexpensive consumer laptops in terms of quality. However, other subnotebooks with unibody constructions in the price segment around 1,000 Euros [~$1048] clearly have an advantage over the ProBook 430 G4. More expensive business notebooks perform better as well.
The test model has the biggest footprint within our comparison group and is also the thickest device at almost 2 cm. This is also the case for the weight of almost 1.6 kg. Still, we found the 13-inch system to be quite portable during our review period. The smaller and lighter competitors might still be a better option if you travel a lot.
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 DIN A4
330 mm / 13 inch 233.5 mm / 9.19 inch 19.8 mm / 0.78 inch 1.6 kg3.48 lbs322.2 mm / 12.7 inch 222.8 mm / 8.77 inch 19.8 mm / 0.78 inch 1.4 kg3.17 lbs327 mm / 12.9 inch 228 mm / 8.98 inch 14.6 mm / 0.575 inch 1.3 kg2.8 lbs307 mm / 12.1 inch 214 mm / 8.43 inch 14 mm / 0.551 inch 1.2 kg2.56 lbs304 mm / 12 inch 201 mm / 7.91 inch 15 mm / 0.591 inch 1.2 kg2.71 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs
HP did not put a whole lot of effort into the port selection and only replaces one USB Type-A port with a Type-C jack – but the USB 3.0 standard [equivalent to USB 3.1 Gen.1] did not change. Thunderbolt and USB 3.1 Gen.2 are not available, and the power supply at this port is not possible, either. The USB 2.0 port at the left side as well as the VGA output are a bit outdated, although the latter can still be handy in office environments. Digital video outputs are supported via HDMI, but high resolution 4K content is limited to 30 Hz.
The performance of the USB ports does not show any limitations, because we managed transfer rates of around 390 MB/s in combination with our Samsung SSD T3. Still, the port selection is not very convincing from a productive point of view. There is no real docking port, so you will have to use common USB replicators, which means you need at least the power supply as well. The USB ports are also located pretty far to the front – handy for USB drives, but not very convenient for the permanent attachment of devices.
The SD-card reader manages average transfer rates in our tests. Values of almost 90 MB/s for sequential read operations and around 76 MB/s when we copy JPEG pictures [~5 MB each] are not unusual for modern notebooks, but our reference card from Toshiba [Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II, up to 260 MB/s] has more potential. Only Dell's XPS 13 is much faster within our comparison group.
Besides a Gigabit Ethernet port, the ProBook 430 G4 can obviously use wireless networks as well. The use of the slightly outdated Intel 7265 module is a bit surprising, but it still works really well in practice. Thanks to the support for fast ac networks and the MIMO technology, there should not be limitations any time soon. The theoretical transfer rate is 866 Mbps, but we only manage about a third of that in our standardized WLAN test with the router Linksys EA8500. This is a bit surprising since the two bigger siblings ProBook 440 G4 and 450 G4 perform better with the same module. Subjectively, the connection was still very reliable and quick. Bluetooth 4.2 is supported as well. The button right above the keyboard is very convenient, as it can be used to activate/deactivate all wireless connections.
The spec sheet lists three more WLAN modules, so there can be differences depending on the SKU: Realtek 802.11 b/g/n [1x1], Intel 3168 [ac, 1x1, 433 Mbps] and Intel 8265 [ac, 2x2, 866 Mbps]. A WWAN module [HP lte4132] is an optional extra.
Above the display are two microphones and the HD webcam. While there is no criticism for the microphones, we cannot see any improvements for the webcam in the end of 2016. You can recognize the other person and the quality might be sufficient for video conferences, but that's about it.
The security features are more important for business notebooks compared to consumer models; the ProBook can meet most of our expectations. HP implements a Trusted Platform Module 2.0 as well as a fingerprint scanner. The latter worked reliably during our review, but you should not swipe the finger too quickly. Modern touch sensors are much more comfortable in this respect.
HP also adds some software solutions including the central hub HP Security Manager, where you can manage all security settings very comfortably – including the fingerprints and the drive encryption.
A SmartCard reader is unfortunately not available for the ProBook, not even as an optional extra.
We also want to mention the BIOS at this point. It is very easy to use with the touchpad and offers comprehensive settings. You can find a brief overview in the screenshots below.
The box of the HP ProBook 430 G4 only includes the 45-Watt power adapter and some service brochures. HP also offers some optional accessories like USB-C docking stations, power adapters and bags.
There are two maintenance hatches on the bottom of the notebook, but the maintainability is still rather limited. Both hatches are only secured by one Philips screw, but you should still be careful since there are numerous small plastic clips. After the removal, you gain access to the 2.5-inch hard drive, the M.2 SSD, the memory [1x slot free] as well as the WLAN module.
The position of the CMOS battery underneath the bar between the two storage drives is a bit unfortunate. Accessing it will require the removal of the whole bottom panel, which is – similar to other notebooks from HP – secured by small Torx screws.
The standard warranty period is 12 months, which is another difference to high-end business laptops [usually 36 months]. It is possible to extend the service with CarePacks from HP. A three-year worldwide on-site service [UL653E], for example, retails for around 190 Euros [~$199]. Please see our Guarantees, Return Policies & Warranties FAQ for country-specific information.
Keyboard
Business notebooks are often defined by their input devices, which are often superior to consumer models. The black chiclet keyboard of the ProBook is no exception. It has a quiet stroke combined with a decent pressure point, so the input is well-suited for frequent writers. Only the layout with the function keys at the right side and the small vertical directional keys might require a small learning period.
The keyboard has a two-stage white illumination, so it is no problem to work in darker environments. The illumination is deactivated after 15 seconds by default, but this setting can be adjusted in the BIOS. There are also other options like FN-Ctrl Swap.
The keyboard is generally superior to many modern consumer subnotebooks, where key travel is often reduced in favor of a thin chassis. However, EliteBooks from HP or ThinkPads from Lenovo are equipped with even better keyboards.
The touchpad is sufficiently sized at 6.5 x 11 cm. It is provided by Synaptics, but the comprehensive drivers' panel is not installed. This means you are limited to the usual Windows settings by default.
The touchpad is implemented as a ClickPad with integrated buttons and works well in practice for the most part. Only small movements are not always perfectly executed on the slightly roughened surface, because you have to overcome a small initial resistance. The buttons worked reliably. Contrary to the more expensive EliteBooks, however, there is no TrackPoint.
As per usual for many business laptops, HP offers several displays for the ProBook 430 G4. We are a bit surprised about the fact that there is still a TN panel with the meager resolution of 1366x768 pixels in the end of 2016. A touchscreen with the same HD resolution is available as well.
Our test model is equipped with the matte Full HD IPS screen from LG [LGD052D]. The resolution of 1920x1080 pixels results in a pixel density of 166 PPI on the 13.3-inch panel. This is a good compromise between a crisp picture, space, and power consumption. Subjectively, we really like the picture. The luminance is not controlled via PWM, and there is only minor backlight bleeding at the lower edge, which was not annoying in practice.
Screen Flickering / PWM [Pulse-Width Modulation]
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation [PWM] . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18360 [minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000] Hz was measured.
260 cd/m²261 cd/m²256 cd/m²244 cd/m²253 cd/m²244 cd/m²240 cd/m²240 cd/m²240 cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LGD052D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 261 cd/m² [Nits] Average: 248.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m² Brightness Distribution: 92 % Center on Battery: 252 cd/m² Contrast: 791:1 [Black: 0.32 cd/m²] ΔE Color 5.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5 ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3 57.6% sRGB [Argyll 1.6.3 3D] 36.7% AdobeRGB 1998 [Argyll 1.6.3 3D] 39.85% AdobeRGB 1998 [Argyll 2.2.0 3D] 57.8% sRGB [Argyll 2.2.0 3D] 38.55% Display P3 [Argyll 2.2.0 3D] Gamma: 2.3
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA LGD052D, , 1920x1080, 13.30Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ AUO B133HAN04.1, , 1920x1080, 13.30Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.30Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Sharp SHP 1447 / LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.30Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 LP133WF2-SPL1, , 1920x1080, 13.30HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES Samsung, , 1366x768, 13.30Display
27%
71%
-1%
-7%
Display P3 Coverage
38.55
48.94
27%
66.4
72%
38.35
-1%
35.87
-7%
sRGB Coverage
57.8
73.3
27%
97.5
69%
57.4
-1%
54
-7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
39.85
50.5
27%
68.4
72%
39.66
0%
37.06
-7%
Response Times
-15%
-2%
-7%
-2%
-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42.4 [15.6, 26.8]
50 [22, 28]
-18%
32.8 [16, 16.8]
23%
52.4 [18.4, 34]
-24%
43.2 [19.6, 23.6]
-2%
54.4 [33.2, 21.2]
-28%
Response Time Black / White *
26.4 [6.4, 20]
29.6 [7.6, 22]
-12%
33.2 [10.8, 22.4]
-26%
23.6 [12, 11.6]
11%
26.8 [9.6, 17.2]
-2%
32.8 [18, 14.8]
-24%
PWM Frequency
220 [50]
192 [90, 176]
Screen
24%
22%
18%
3%
-68%
Brightness middle
253
375
48%
351.2
39%
344
36%
233
-8%
212
-16%
Brightness
249
358
44%
325
31%
326
31%
227
-9%
205
-18%
Brightness Distribution
92
87
-5%
89
-3%
87
-5%
86
-7%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.32
0.39
-22%
0.195
39%
0.36
-13%
0.22
31%
0.71
-122%
Contrast
791
962
22%
1801
128%
956
21%
1059
34%
299
-62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.28
4.6
13%
7.4
-40%
6.09
-15%
5.41
-2%
12.06
-128%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
13.66
8.8
36%
9.08
34%
10
27%
13.61
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.8
4
-5%
6.71
-77%
5.36
-41%
4.15
-9%
13.41
-253%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.34 94%
2.74 80%
2.01 109%
2.45 90%
2.41 91%
CCT
6646 98%
7304 89%
7222 90%
7230 90%
6773 96%
15382 42%
Color Space [Percent of AdobeRGB 1998]
36.7
57.9
58%
50.48
38%
62.25
70%
36.52
0%
34.3
-7%
Color Space [Percent of sRGB]
57.6
88.7
54%
73.31
27%
97.54
69%
57.16
-1%
54.2
-6%
Total Average [Program / Settings]
5% /18%
16% /20%
27% /25%
0% /2%
-34% /-49%
* ... smaller is better
Our measurements show that the test model is clearly superior compared to the TN panel in the predecessor, but both the luminance as well as the contrast ratio are sometimes clearly beaten by the other rivals. We can determine an average brightness of almost 250 nits with a contrast of 791:1 [black value 0.32 cd/m²]. The luminance was still sufficient in practice, not least thanks to the matte panel surface.
The color accuracy is also pretty decent ex-works with average DeltaE-2000 deviations of 5.28 for the colors and 3.8 for the grayscale compared to the sRGB reference color space. We can see the biggest deviations for blue and purple, which does not really change after a calibration either, where the grayscale performance benefits the most. Still, there is no blue cast ex-works. The panel is not suited for professional picture editing due to the small color gamut [58% sRGB, 37% AdobeRGB].
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry [ghosting]. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
↔ Response Time Black to White26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.4 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 [minimum] to 240 [maximum] ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices [21.7 ms]. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 [minimum] to 636 [maximum] ms. » 65 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices [34.1 ms].
The luminance is not reduced on battery power and the outdoor capabilities are actually not that bad thanks to the matte panel surface – despite the average luminance. Only direct light sources will be too challenging for the background illumination. The viewing-angle stability of the IPS panel is very good, but we have also seen better models. There is sometimes a slight gray hue when you change the angle, but the contents were still perfectly visible.
Our test model with the modern Intel Core i7 processor and the SSD is very fast in practice and provides plenty of performance for all common tasks. However, it is also one of the most expensive SKUs, and the processor range covers everything from Pentium all the way up to the Core i7. There are also models without SSDs, which will clearly affect the subjective performance impression. One positive aspect is the memory with two slots [not soldered], so upgrades are easy. Dedicated graphics cards are not available for the ProBook 430 G4.
HP uses the current top model from Intel's ULV lineup, the Core i7-7500U. It is a dual-core processor with a TDP of 15 Watts based on the latest Kaby lake architecture, which was introduced a couple of months ago. The chip is manufactured in an improved 14-nm process, which reduces the power consumption and therefore improves the Turbo Boost utilization. The clocks are much higher compared to the previous Skylake Core i7-6500U [up to 3.1 GHz] and both cores can now reach up to 3.5 GHz.
HP generally follows Intel's TDP target but allows a higher consumption of 25 Watts for the first 28 seconds. However, the temperature is actually the limiting factor under load. We can only see the full Turbo of 3.5 GHz for both cores for a couple of seconds under load, before the clocks drop to 3.0-3.1 GHz. The benchmark results are still good, and our test model can beat all the comparison devices.
The performance is limited on battery power, where the Turbo Boost is deactivated by default. Tasks are therefore executed with up to 2.7 GHz to reduce the power consumption. If you need all the performance on the go, you can change this setting in the BIOS [Enable Turbo Boost on DC]. More benchmarks for the Core i7-7500U are available in our Tech section.
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
144 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
341 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
38.68 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Help
HP equips our test model with an M.2 SSD from SanDisk. It is a system drive with a capacity of 256 GB, but it only uses the SATA-III interface. This means transfer rates are limited to around 500-550 MB/s, which is supported by the benchmarks [at least sequential read]. Our drive manages little more than 500 MB/s, but it only manages 330 MB/s for write operations. Modern PCIe-NVMe drives manage much higher sequential transfer rates, but the difference is smaller for the 4K results, which are more important in practice. You will therefore not notice a big difference in everyday situations.
HP also implements a 2.5-inch hard drive with a storage capacity of 1 TB. The drive from Western Digital runs at 5400 rpm and is therefore ideal for large amounts of data. More benchmarks for different hard drives are listed in our comprehensive SSD/HDD list.
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ LiteOn CV1-8B512Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUKLenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHPCrystalDiskMark 3.0
27%
109%
92%
26%
Read Seq
505
502
-1%
1233
144%
1193
136%
461.7
-9%
Write Seq
328.9
418.9
27%
733
123%
309.6
-6%
297.8
-9%
Read 512
313.6
341.3
9%
1036
230%
613
95%
351.6
12%
Write 512
301
389.7
29%
439.9
46%
311
3%
298.4
-1%
Read 4k
21.69
29.69
37%
29.31
35%
42.43
96%
31.85
47%
Write 4k
80.4
86.8
8%
116.9
45%
144.9
80%
68.5
-15%
Read 4k QD32
132.2
301.3
128%
479.2
262%
549
315%
360.9
173%
Write 4k QD32
258.8
211.2
-18%
218.3
-16%
311.3
20%
276.2
7%
Sequential Read: 505 MB/s
Sequential Write: 328.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 258.8 MB/s
Powerful processor, fast SSD and sufficient memory – what could go wrong? Not much in practice, because the system is very responsive and inputs are executed very quickly. We check our subjective impression with the synthetic PCMarks, where the new ProBook 430 G4 is actually one of the fastest devices within our comparison group. You can even increase the performance a bit with an additional memory module.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3883 Points +9%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3554 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3535 Points -1%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ HD Graphics 520, 6500U, LiteOn CV1-8B512
3386 Points -5%
HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
3043 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3024 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4717 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4680 Points -1%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4568 Points -3%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ HD Graphics 520, 6500U, LiteOn CV1-8B512
4316 Points -9%
HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
4106 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4041 Points -14%
PCMark 7 Score 5333 pointsPCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 3554 pointsPCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 4588 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 4717 points
Help
The graphics adapter of the new Kaby Lake ULV-CPUs has the designation Intel HD Graphics 620. It can reach a maximum core clock of 1050 MHz in combination with the i7 processor. Similar to the previous HD Graphics 520, the GPU has 24 Execution Units, but the performance was further improved. At least in theory, because the memory of our ProBook only runs in a single-channel configuration, so it cannot utilize the full potential of the HD Graphics 620. The ProBook is even behind the previous HD 520 in some benchmarks as a result.
The GPU performance is not reduced on battery power. More benchmarks for the HD Graphics 620 are available here.
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPUHP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2206 Points +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U
2101 Points +44%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
1835 Points +25%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1545 Points +6%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1463 Points
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1428 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1252 Points -14%
3DMark1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsLenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U
11531 Points +68%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
9056 Points +32%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
8177 Points +19%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
6881 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
5898 Points -14%
1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsHP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
1621 Points +112%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
963 Points +26%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
935 Points +22%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
765 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
719 Points -6%
3DMark 11 Performance 1569 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 5520 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 719 points
Help
The ProBook 430 G4 was not designed for gaming, and there are no SKUs with dedicated graphics cards, either. If you still want to play a game during a lunch break, you should focus on older or less demanding titles. However, the native FHD resolution is still too challenging. It is possible to increase the GPU performance a bit with the addition of a second memory module.
The HP ProBook 430 G4 is usually a very quiet device with light and medium workloads, where the fan is often deactivated. The mechanical hard drive is a bit annoying in this case. The murmur is not loud, but it is still audible.
The fan will spin up under load, but around 33 dB[A] is still pretty quiet. We only reached the maximum noise level under sustained maximum load, but 36 dB[A] is still not really a problem. We could not hear other annoying sounds like coil whining or the like.
Noise Level
Idle
29.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB[A]
HDD 29.8 dB[A]Load 33.4 / 36 dB[A]
30 dB silent
40 dB[A] audible
50 dB[A] loud
min:
The small subnotebook does not get overly warm even under heavy workloads, and only the areas around the cooling solution will be perceptible. Up to 39 °C at the bottom is still good and there will be no restrictions. The center area of the keyboard does warm up a bit as well, but the palm rest stays conveniently cool all the time.
Both the processor as well as the graphics card can only maintain their maximum clocks for a very short period in our stress test with the tools Prime95 and FurMark. The chip reaches 86 °C after a couple of seconds, which will limit the consumption from 25 to 15 Watts. The result is CPU throttling to 1.4-1.5 GHz. The GPU has a bit more headroom and maintains 850-900 MHz. A 3DMark 11 run immediately after the stress test did not determine a lower score.
38.7 °C 102 F35.9 °C 97 F29.1 °C 84 F 31.5 °C 89 F37 °C 99 F26.2 °C 79 F 24.5 °C 76 F24 °C 75 F25.4 °C 78 F Maximum: 38.7 °C = 102 F Average: 30.3 °C = 87 F 34.7 °C 94 F39.4 °C 103 F33.8 °C 93 F26.7 °C 80 F30.6 °C 87 F26.2 °C 79 F25 °C 77 F24.8 °C 77 F23.6 °C 74 F Maximum: 39.4 °C = 103 F Average: 29.4 °C = 85 F
Power Supply [max.] 37.5 °C = 100 F | Room Temperature 20.3 °C = 69 F | Fluke 62 Max
[+] The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office. [+] The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office. [+] The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F [+] In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F. [+] The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch. [±] The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F [+0.9 °C / 1.7 F].
The speakers are located behind a grille above the keyboard. They are sufficiently loud at almost 85 dB[A], but the sound quality is not very convincing. Bass is basically non-existent, so the subjective sound impression is too focused on the high tones and is a bit tinny. The provided audio software offers some presets, but they cannot change much. The audio signal at the 3.5 mm jack is almost noise-free. A mute button is located on the right side above the keyboard.
dB[A] 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.534.72535.939.33131.136.34036.238.5503439.6632831.78027.730.410034.234.41253435.416024.437.720024.748.725024.362.731522.667.440021.864.650020.762.863020.463.78002066.910002065.5125020.175.4160019.973.9200019.169.9250019.172.2315020.276.940002274.1500023.471630020.470.480002072.61000020.474.81250020.372.31600019.762.8SPL3384.7N1.961.2median 20.4median 67.4Delta27.233.429.733.231.633.129.231.631.931.631.33730.339.729.945.427.154.926.749.123.856.724.156.623.25422.360.221.166.721.468.920.170.219.768.618.871.718.672.418.367.117.866.517.767.817.564.817.365.317.562.617.661.417.556.217.553.317.546.717.680.330.746.41.5median 62.6median 18.66.82.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EAAcer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA audio analysis[+] | speakers can play relatively loud [84.6 dB] Bass 100 - 315 Hz [-] | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median [±] | linearity of bass is average [13.1% delta to prev. frequency] Mids 400 - 2000 Hz [+] | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median [+] | mids are linear [6.8% delta to prev. frequency] Highs 2 - 16 kHz [±] | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median [+] | highs are linear [5.4% delta to prev. frequency] Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz [±] | linearity of overall sound is average [18.9% difference to median] Compared to same class » 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 64% worse » The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53% Compared to all devices tested » 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ audio analysis[±] | speaker loudness is average but good [80 dB] Bass 100 - 315 Hz [±] | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median [±] | linearity of bass is average [11.9% delta to prev. frequency] Mids 400 - 2000 Hz [±] | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median [±] | linearity of mids is average [7.6% delta to prev. frequency] Highs 2 - 16 kHz [+] | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median [+] | highs are linear [4.6% delta to prev. frequency] Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz [±] | linearity of overall sound is average [17.2% difference to median] Compared to same class » 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 53% worse » The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53% Compared to all devices tested » 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Frequency comparison [checkboxes are selectable/deselectable]
Our consumption measurements are not really surprising: The idle results are average within our comparison group. Only the maximum consumption of 43.5 Watts is a bit surprising at first, but this value will drop after the previously described throttling sets in and we can measure 30.6 Watts at the end of our stress test. The provided 45-Watts power adapter is sufficient.
HP implements a 3-cell lithium-ion battery with a capacity of 48 Wh. The manufacturer advertises a runtime of up to 16 hours. We just miss this value in the Reader's Test with the lowest display luminance, but this result is hardly realistic.
We can determine good runtimes with an adjusted luminance of 150 nits. A little more than 7 hours in the WLAN test and more than 8.5 hours of continuous video playback [Full HD, H.264, Big Buck Bunny] should be sufficient for normal business days. The results are also good within the comparison group, only the Dell XPS 13 lasts considerably longer, which is also a result of its bigger battery capacity.
Maximum load [maximum luminance, high-performance power plan] will drain the battery in 02:48 hours, which is also the minimum runtime you can expect. A full charge of the battery takes around 2.5 hours.
Battery Runtime
Idle [without WLAN, min brightness]15h 53minWiFi Websurfing [Edge 25.10586.672.0]7h 10minBig Buck Bunny H.264 1080p8h 40minLoad [maximum brightness]2h 48min
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 48 WhAcer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 45 WhDell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 WhLenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, 46 WhLenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 42 WhHP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 44 WhBattery Runtime
-8%
29%
-18%
-12%
-33%
Reader / Idle
953
1028
8%
1295
36%
810
-15%
944
-1%
449
-53%
H.264
520
486
-7%
469
-10%
337
-35%
WiFi v1.3
430
472
10%
677
57%
418
-3%
372
-13%
377
-12%
Load
168
99
-41%
157
-7%
89
-47%
129
-23%
118
-30%
Pros
- good IPS display
- decent chassis
- good system performance
- long battery runtimes
- comfortable keyboard
Cons
- limited maintainability
- no docking port
- bad speakers
- bad webcam
- no TrackPoint
The fourth generation of the ProBook 430 is a solid, but also rather conservative update of HP's 13.3-inch business notebook. The manufacturer does not make any compromises in terms of chassis, performance, battery runtimes and the [optional] IPS display.
A look at the port selection and the security features, however, quickly shows that we are dealing with an entry-level business machine. HP does implement a USB-C port, but it is only based on the 3.0 standard. A docking port is not available, either, which will complicate the integration into your working environment. A SmartCard reader is also missing.
Kaby Lake, good display, and comfortable keyboard – the HP ProBook 430 G4 is a successful update of the 13.3-inch subnotebook. There are some compromises though, and our test model is not a bargain, either.
The competition still has to launch their Kaby Lake updates, so we will have to wait a bit for the comparisons. Our test model is at the upper end of the ProBook line in terms of the price, so it has a hard time competing with the consumer systems. For more than 1,000 Euros [~$1048], you will get thinner Ultrabooks with modern ports and often better displays, but you will have to waive the security features and often the comfortable keyboard in return.
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA- 12/26/2016 v6[old] Andreas Osthoff
Pointing Device
84 / 20-67 → 100%
Application Performance
88%
Office - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
Editor of the original article: Sebastian Jentsch - Managing Editor Consumer Laptops - 1753 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2010
Computers always had an important place in my life, starting with an Intel 80286 microprocessor in the early 1990s. I became interested in the productive side of technology, especially in campus radio, while studying at TU Chemnitz and during a trainee program in Belfast. Hardware interests led me to manage Notebookjournal.de, which is now a division of Notebooksbilliger, for a few years. I became self-employed in 2010 and took the next logical step in my career by starting to write for Notebookcheck.
Translator: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1584 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
I grew up with modern consumer electronics and my first computer was a Commodore C64, which encouraged my interest in building my own systems. I started working as a review editor for Notebookcheck during my dual studies at Siemens. Currently, I am mainly responsible for dealing with business laptops and mobile workstations. It’s a great experience to be able to review the latest devices and technologies and then compare them with each other.