Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024

Tiger Lake moves ahead. The Acer Swift 5 SF514 comes with Intel's EVO label and combines a Tiger Lake CPU with a slim design and good mobility. Our detailed review clarifies what buyers can expect from the 14-inch laptop.

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024

With the introduction of Intel's EVO platform, there is now a quite useful label marking laptops that possess some key specifics. Currently these always include Tiger Lake CPUs, a slim build, a specific battery life, and a required brightness of the display. How well these features are implemented is shown for example by our tests of the MSI Prestige 14 EVO, the Schenker Vision 15, and the Dell XPS 13 9310.

The Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T also belongs to the laptops with an EVO label. In our test unit configuration, it competes with an Intel Core i5-1135G7, the internal Intel Iris Xe graphics, 8 GB of RAM, and a 512 GB SSD against the competitors listed below. Below each section, you can also add more laptops from our database to the comparison.

Processor

Intel Core i5-1135G7 4 x 2.4 - 4.2 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AU Optronics AUO7490, IPS, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP

Soundcard

Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combined audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 14.95 x 318.9 x 207 ( = 0.59 x 12.56 x 8.15 in)

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Norton Security, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.005 kg ( = 35.45 oz / 2.22 pounds), Power Supply: 275 g ( = 9.7 oz / 0.61 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Acer has manufactured the case of the Swift 5 SF514 from a magnesium-aluminum alloy, making it very light but also extremely robust. The display is protected by Corning Gorilla glass, and the whole laptop is covered by a coating layer that was created based on silver ions and is supposed to have an antimicrobial effect, according to Acer. This goes for the whole laptop, including the rubber feet, keyboard, and hinges. The latter allow a display opening angle of about 140 degrees and always keep the display tightly in its position.

In the comparison with other laptops of its class, the Acer Swift 5 SF514 offers similarly small dimensions. These are about the same as the Asus ZenBook 14, with that being even slightly slimmer. However, at a weight of only 1 kg (~2,2 lb), the Acer laptop is the lightest in our test field.

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA DIN A4

331 mm / 13 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 20.4 mm / 0.803 inch 1.7 kg3.72 lbs319 mm / 12.6 inch 215 mm / 8.46 inch 16 mm / 0.63 inch 1.2 kg2.65 lbs318.9 mm / 12.6 inch 207 mm / 8.15 inch 14.95 mm / 0.589 inch 1 kg2.22 lbs319 mm / 12.6 inch 208 mm / 8.19 inch 13.9 mm / 0.547 inch 1.2 kg2.58 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

While the amount of connections is limited in the Acer Swift 5, with the available Thunderbolt 4 port, you can add numerous additional connections using the corresponding adapters. However, you have to make do without a storage card reader.

The Acer Swift 5 SF514 is able to create wireless connections via WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0. While the WLAN speeds when transferring data using our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router turn out very good at 1329 Mbit/s on average, when receiving data it is only sufficient for the last place in our test field with an average of 744 Mbit/s.

050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400Tooltip

Like many manufacturers, Acer also uses only a low-resolution webcam with 0.9 MP in the Swift 5 SF514. The image quality turns out correspondingly meager, blurring the contents even in good light conditions.

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024

17.6 ∆E

25.1 ∆E

20.3 ∆E

15.8 ∆E

17.1 ∆E

17.5 ∆E

24.8 ∆E

20.8 ∆E

21.4 ∆E

15.5 ∆E

14.8 ∆E

16 ∆E

13.7 ∆E

20.3 ∆E

24.5 ∆E

13.2 ∆E

18.1 ∆E

17.9 ∆E

2.9 ∆E

12 ∆E

21 ∆E

18.7 ∆E

12.1 ∆E

6.8 ∆E

ColorChecker Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN: 16.99 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 25.09 ∆E

The box of the Swift 5 SF514 only contains the laptop and its power supply. However, Acer offers numerous general accessories on its own website.

The Acer laptop can be opened after removing all the visible screws at the bottom of the case. Once inside, you can only replace the SSD and the WLAN module, since the rest of the components are soldered in.

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024
Acer Swift 5 SF514 - Maintenance options

Acer offers buyers of the Swift 5 SF514 a warranty period of 24 months.

Keyboard

The keys of the Swift 5 SF514 offer a clearly noticeable pressure point that could almost be called "crisp." After a short period of getting used to the keyboard, typing tasks can be accomplished easily. There is also a single-step keyboard illumination.

As mouse replacement, Acer uses a ClickPad in the Swift 5 SF514. The surface is well suited for navigation of the mouse pointer, and clicks are recognized reliably via mechanical pressure as well as touch input. In addition, there is the 14-inch touchscreen which is very responsive to touch inputs, reliably implementing the commands in the system.

The display of the Acer Swift 5 SF514 consists of a 14-inch touch-capable IPS panel that offers a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. The maximum brightness is 377 cd/m² on average, which makes it the highest in our test field. On the other hand, at 79%, the brightness distribution is the lowest. In addition to the screen used here, the Swift 5 SF514 is also available without a touchscreen.

Since PWM is not used for brightness control, users with sensitive eyes should not have to expect any difficulties.

363 cd/m²377 cd/m²367 cd/m²343 cd/m²404 cd/m²397 cd/m²329 cd/m²418 cd/m²399 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics AUO7490 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 418 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 377.4 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m² Brightness Distribution: 79 % Center on Battery: 407 cd/m² Contrast: 1616:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²) ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 0.84 ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3 98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D) 68.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) 98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) 67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D) Gamma: 2.35

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN AU Optronics AUO7490, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE N140HCA-EAC, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 AUO B140HAN06.2 (AUO623D), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 14.00Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00Display

-37%

3%

1%

Display P3 Coverage

67

41.96

-37%

68.8

3%

68.6

2%

sRGB Coverage

98.3

63

-36%

99.4

1%

98.3

0%

AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage

68.3

43.37

-37%

70.9

4%

69.8

2%

Response Times

-76%

-117%

-77%

Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *

30 (2, 28)

42 (21.6, 20.4)

-40%

59.6 (26.4, 33.2)

-99%

49.6 (27.6, 22)

-65%

Response Time Black / White *

14 (3, 11)

29.6 (15.6, 14)

-111%

32.8 (16.4, 16.4)

-134%

26.4 (13.2, 13.2)

-89%

PWM FrequencyScreen

-114%

-36%

-22%

Brightness middle

404

259

-36%

293

-27%

375.1

-7%

Brightness

377

244

-35%

277

-27%

371

-2%

Brightness Distribution

79

92

16%

89

13%

91

15%

Black Level *

0.25

0.21

16%

0.18

28%

0.34

-36%

Contrast

1616

1233

-24%

1628

1%

1103

-32%

Colorchecker dE 2000 *

1.47

4.3

-193%

2.95

-101%

1.79

-22%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

2.6

17.7

-581%

6.03

-132%

3.05

-17%

Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *

0.84

3.8

-352%

0.9

-7%

1.79

-113%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

1.7

1.5

12%

4.2

-147%

2.3

-35%

Gamma

2.35 94%

2.04 108%

2.099 105%

2.29 96%

CCT

6662 98%

6609 98%

6622 98%

6405 101%

Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)

63

40

-37%

71

13%

63.9

1%

Color Space (Percent of sRGB)

98

62.9

-36%

93

-5%

98.8

1%

Total Average (Program / Settings)

-76% /-94%

-50% /-39%

-33% /-25%

* ... smaller is better

According to our measurements, the display of the Swift 5 SF514 offers a very good contrast ratio of 1616:1 and a good black value of 0.25 cd/m². With 98% (sRGB) and 63% (AdobeRGB), the color space coverage is also very good.

In addition, the CalMAN analysis show that colors are reproduced with only few deviations already in the state of delivery. However, a calibration still brings some small improvements. You can download the corresponding ICC file in the link above, to the right of the graphic on the brightness distribution of the display.

Due to the reflective display surface, the Acer Swift 5 SF514 is only suitable to a limited extent for usage outdoors. While the high brightness still allows you to work in the shade, there are too many reflections in direct sunlight.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024

↘ 11 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024

↘ 28 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18493 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The viewing angles of the Acer laptop's IPS panel are very stable. The display contents can be read from almost any angle without too many distortions or color deviations.

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024
Viewing angle stability

With the Swift 5 SF514, Acer targets users who are looking for a light laptop with a good system performance to take along with them on the road. Buyers have the choice of several processors from Intel's Tiger Lake generation that also have an influence on the price. There are also several configurations of storage and working memory, depending on your selection of equipment.

For users with a slightly higher demand on the 3D performance, some models with Nvidia's GeForce MX350 are also available.

The Intel Core i5-1135G7 used here is a quad-core processor from Intel's Tiger Lake generation. Its clock speeds lie between 2.4 and 4.2 GHz, with the configured TDP and cooling system being the determining factors on the performance. Acer has configured the Swift 5 with a PL2 of 64 watts and PL1 of 28 watts, allowing it to reach the maximum performance of the i5-1135G7 at least in theory.

In our Cinebench R15 constant load test, the CPU starts with a good value. Even though this drops over time, it still turns out better than the Intel Core i7-1165G7 in the Asus ZenBook 14, for example. The Swift 5 SF514 also shows itself significantly more powerful than other laptops with the i5-1135G7 such as the Lenovo ThinkPad L13. In the single benchmarks, the CPU in the Acer laptop achieves an above-average result, with the multi-core value in particular turning out higher than for other laptops with the Intel Core i5-1135G7.

050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

579 Points +11%

Average of class Office (181.3 - 764, n=120, last 2 years)

555 Points +6%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

543 Points +4%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

523 Points

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

521 Points 0%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

521 Points 0%

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (375 - 527, n=62)

507 Points -3%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

451 Points -14%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)Average of class Office (356 - 5904, n=120, last 2 years)

3024 Points +44%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

2283 Points +8%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

2253 Points +7%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

2105 Points

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (979 - 2382, n=62)

1827 Points -13%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

1728 Points -18%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

1466 Points -30%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

1466 Points -30%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64BitMSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

224 Points +13%

Average of class Office (82.6 - 284, n=119, last 2 years)

215 Points +9%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

214 Points +8%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

199 Points +1%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

199 Points +1%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

198 Points

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (141.4 - 205, n=61)

194.4 Points -2%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

174 Points -12%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64BitAverage of class Office (160.8 - 2642, n=121, last 2 years)

1359 Points +48%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

933 (873.52min - 933.34max) Points +2%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

916 Points

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

888 (852.57min - 888.2max) Points -3%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

810 (629.83min - 862.05max) Points -12%

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (431 - 941, n=65)

792 Points -14%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

631 (545.75min - 631.08max) Points -31%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

631 (545.75min - 631.08max) Points -31%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPULenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

794 Seconds * -33%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

794 Seconds * -33%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

694 Seconds * -16%

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (499 - 1044, n=60)

662 Seconds * -11%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

598 Seconds *

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

562 Seconds * +6%

Average of class Office (215 - 2844, n=121, last 2 years)

544 Seconds * +9%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

533 Seconds * +11%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

5096 MIPS +8%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

5029 MIPS +6%

Average of class Office (2233 - 6687, n=122, last 2 years)

4971 MIPS +5%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

4785 MIPS +1%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

4785 MIPS +1%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

4727 MIPS

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3924 - 4921, n=62)

4674 MIPS -1%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

4312 MIPS -9%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4Average of class Office (4226 - 62349, n=121, last 2 years)

34011 MIPS +39%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

24996 MIPS +3%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

24882 MIPS +2%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

24386 MIPS

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (14745 - 24873, n=62)

21407 MIPS -12%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

21036 MIPS -14%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

19113 MIPS -22%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

19113 MIPS -22%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-CoreAsus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

1523 Points +11%

Average of class Office (510 - 1974, n=123, last 2 years)

1454 Points +6%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

1398 Points +2%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

1373 Points

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1147 - 1428, n=58)

1373 Points 0%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

1369 Points 0%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

1369 Points 0%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

1085 Points -21%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-CoreAverage of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=123, last 2 years)

6458 Points +24%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

5560 Points +7%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

5456 Points +5%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

5197 Points

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3475 - 5472, n=58)

4663 Points -10%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

4597 Points -12%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

4597 Points -12%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

4409 Points -15%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k PresetAverage of class Office (1.55 - 17.4, n=121, last 2 years)

8.98 fps +41%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

7.12 fps +11%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

6.93 fps +8%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

6.39 fps

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3.57 - 7.6, n=57)

5.93 fps -7%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

5.34 fps -16%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

4.74 fps -26%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

4.74 fps -26%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDFLenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

60.5 s * -20%

Average of class Office (31.3 - 117.5, n=121, last 2 years)

56.7 s * -12%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

56.1 s * -11%

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (44.2 - 62.9, n=60)

52.8 s * -5%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

50.5 s *

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

47.9 s * +5%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

47.8 s * +5%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

47.8 s * +5%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall meanLenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

0.648 sec * -2%

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (0.619 - 0.727, n=59)

0.642 sec * -1%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7

0.638 sec *

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

0.635 sec * -0%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7

0.635 sec * -0%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7

0.593 sec * +7%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7

0.591 sec * +7%

Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.397, n=120, last 2 years)

0.591 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

198 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

916 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

96.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Help

In the PCMark 10 benchmark, which evaluates the system performance, the Acer Swift 5 SF514 is able to achieve the second place in our test field. Particularly the values for "Digital Content Creation" and "Essentials" turn out very good here. In everyday operation, the Acer laptop also always runs smoothly and there are no micro stutters or anything like that.

You can find out about the performance of other laptops in our tests in our CPU benchmark list.

PCMark 10 ScoreAverage of class Office (2325 - 7157, n=105, last 2 years)

5307 Points +11%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162

4894 Points +2%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI

4794 Points

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8

4704 Points -2%

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4026 - 4952, n=53)

4613 Points -4%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB

4425 Points -8%

EssentialsAverage of class Office (5095 - 20841, n=105, last 2 years)

9822 Points +1%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI

9772 Points

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162

9727 Points 0%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8

9585 Points -2%

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8149 - 9917, n=53)

9310 Points -5%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB

8578 Points -12%

ProductivityAverage of class Office (3053 - 10099, n=105, last 2 years)

7425 Points +14%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8

6619 Points +2%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162

6507 Points 0%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB

6501 Points 0%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI

6487 Points

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5040 - 6619, n=53)

6218 Points -4%

Digital Content CreationAverage of class Office (1912 - 8987, n=105, last 2 years)

5696 Points +21%

MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162

5026 Points +7%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI

4719 Points

Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (3548 - 5255, n=53)

4612 Points -2%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8

4463 Points -5%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB

4218 Points -11%

PCMark 10 Score 4794 points

Help

The Acer Swift 5 SF514 shows the least latencies in our test field, making it very suitable for real-time applications.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GBAsus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI

* ... smaller is better

In our test configuration, Acer uses a 512 GB SSD from SK Hynix that achieves average results in the storage benchmarks. In the comparison with our selected competitors, the storage also shows itself to be average. However, the read and write rates are still good and are reflected by quick data access and short wait times when starting applications in everyday operation.

You can find out about the performance of other storage solutions in our tests in our HDD/SSD benchmark list.

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNILenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GBMSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8Average SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

5%

96%

18%

-2%

Write 4K

77.8

76.7

-1%

248.4

219%

132.3

70%

111 (77.8 - 157.3, n=7)

43%

Read 4K

46.98

32.04

-32%

56.4

20%

51.7

10%

42.6 (32.8 - 49.8, n=7)

-9%

Write Seq

1054

1019

-3%

2513

138%

1264

20%

1037 (851 - 1117, n=7)

-2%

Read Seq

1137

2014

77%

2250

98%

1484

31%

1100 (1008 - 1183, n=7)

-3%

Write 4K Q32T1

474.5

415.6

-12%

589

24%

478.4

1%

410 (308 - 475, n=7)

-14%

Read 4K Q32T1

601

367.1

-39%

696

16%

366.9

-39%

444 (332 - 601, n=7)

-26%

Write Seq Q32T1

1062

1337

26%

2515

137%

1750

65%

1072 (1043 - 1102, n=7)

1%

Read Seq Q32T1

2309

2850

23%

4915

113%

1970

-15%

2269 (2154 - 2311, n=7)

-2%

AS SSD

35%

101%

-31%

-5%

Seq Read

1405

2247

60%

3760

168%

1219

-13%

1458 (1172 - 1975, n=7)

4%

Seq Write

1011

1079

7%

2335

131%

947

-6%

900 (678 - 1064, n=7)

-11%

4K Read

53.7

42.52

-21%

66.8

24%

50.9

-5%

49 (41.8 - 53.7, n=7)

-9%

4K Write

122.7

129.1

5%

184.3

50%

150.9

23%

114.9 (90.1 - 123.2, n=7)

-6%

4K-64 Read

803

1316

64%

1801

124%

587

-27%

776 (703 - 819, n=7)

-3%

4K-64 Write

810

1332

64%

1754

117%

862

6%

744 (689 - 810, n=7)

-8%

Access Time Read *

0.086

0.135

0.083

0.061 (0.04 - 0.09, n=6)

Access Time Write *

0.032

0.029

9%

0.018

44%

0.114

-256%

0.03329 (0.031 - 0.04, n=7)

-4%

Score Read

997

1583

59%

2244

125%

760

-24%

970 (904 - 1055, n=7)

-3%

Score Write

1034

1569

52%

2172

110%

1108

7%

949 (878 - 1034, n=7)

-8%

Score Total

2536

3907

54%

5500

117%

2260

-11%

2401 (2290 - 2562, n=7)

-5%

Total Average (Program / Settings)

20% /22%

99% /99%

-7% /-9%

-4% /-4%

* ... smaller is better

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2309 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1062 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 601 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 474.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1137 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1054 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.98 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 77.8 MB/s

The internal Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs graphics unit in the Acer Swift SF514 is responsible for the display of image content. It shares its working memory with the CPU and benefits from a multi-channel configuration as we see it here. Correspondingly, the benchmark results also turn out good, with the Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in the Acer laptop almost reaching the Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. With this, the graphics unit is suited for tasks such as simple image processing, for example.

You can compare the performance of other graphics units in our GPU benchmark list.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPUMSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7

7090 Points +16%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7

6563 Points +7%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7

6117 Points

Average of class Office (1474 - 12195, n=116, last 2 years)

5828 Points -5%

Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2246 - 6477, n=105)

5167 Points -16%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

3401 Points -44%

3DMark1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsMSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7

5848 Points +22%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7

5139 Points +8%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7

4775 Points

Average of class Office (712 - 8815, n=118, last 2 years)

4046 Points -15%

Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1560 - 5305, n=107)

3782 Points -21%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

2285 Points -52%

2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsMSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7

1670 Points +21%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7

1401 Points +1%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7

1384 Points

Average of class Office (242 - 3186, n=114, last 2 years)

1311 Points -5%

Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (561 - 1511, n=104)

1170 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance 6566 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 4325 points3DMark Time Spy Score 1556 points

Help

The graphics unit of the Acer Swift 5 SF514 is suited only for older games or those with little demands on the graphics performance.

We list the performance that you can expect in additional games in our GPU games list.

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

54.3 (36.8min) fps +11%

Average of class Office (8.9 - 110.4, n=124, last 2 years)

49.4 fps +1%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

48.7 (33.3min) fps

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

46.4 (25.8min) fps -5%

Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (10.4 - 70.9, n=105)

42.5 fps -13%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

34.7 (31.6min) fps -29%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

30.1 (21.1min) fps -38%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

30.1 (21.1min) fps -38%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

37 fps +9%

Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

35.4 fps +4%

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

34 fps

Average of class Office (6.45 - 95.2, n=122, last 2 years)

31.6 fps -7%

Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6.45 - 40.5, n=106)

28.7 fps -16%

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

27.8 fps -18%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

25.9 fps -24%

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

25.9 fps -24%

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024
Noise characteristics

The Swift 5 SF514 remains silent during office and browser operation, and if the fans do happen to turn on, they run evenly, producing an audible whirr that is easy to ignore.

We did not notice any additional noises, such as coil whine or anything similar, in our test unit.

Noise Level

Idle

25 / 25 / 25 dB(A)

Load 34.7 / 34 dB(A)

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024

30 dB silent

40 dB(A) audible

50 dB(A) loud

min:

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024
, med:
Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024
, max:
Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024
Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.330.732.531.129.3253334.436.335.1333133.432.229.129.433.44024.833.53023.524.85023.829.124.126.523.8632321.817.824.2238023.118.417.722.123.110021.118.617.519.821.112520.517.615.717.320.51601615.614.214.51620017.115.313.614.717.125016.71613.315.416.731515.114.512.514.315.140016.917.411.612.816.950018.218.611.111.918.263020.120.411.111.220.180020.621.21111.220.6100023.124.911.311.223.1125024.223.611.311.324.2160024.223.911.811.524.2200026.726.112.111.926.7250024.423.412.512.324.43150262212.812.526400020.619.51313.320.6500018.717.813.713.618.7630018.417.313.714.118.4800014.914.314.51414.91000014.313.814.513.714.31250014.413.614.313.614.41600013.813.31313.513.8SPL34.73424.824.834.7N1.91.70.60.61.9median 18.7median 17.8median 13median 13.5median 18.7Delta3.93.71.31.33.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024
Stress test

Our measurements attest the Acer laptop with surface temperatures of up to 33.9 °C (93 °F) under load. The warmest spot is in the back area of the center, with the palm rests always remaining cool. This means that you can also use the laptop also easily under load and operate it on your lap, for example.

During our about hour-long constant load test, the temperatures inside the Swift 5 SF514 rose up to 97 °C (207 °F). Until the end of the test, these were lowered by the cooling system down to an average value of about 60 °C (140 °F), with the clock speeds being lower than the basic clock speed at an average of 1.5 GHz. However, the system could still be operated smoothly. Since a load as in our stress test is almost impossible in everyday operation, users don't need to expect any limitations due to temperatures being too high.

32.5 °C 91 F33.9 °C 93 F31.2 °C 88 F 32.8 °C 91 F34.5 °C 94 F27.9 °C 82 F 28.1 °C 83 F27.6 °C 82 F25.5 °C 78 F Maximum: 34.5 °C = 94 F Average: 30.4 °C = 87 F 33 °C 91 F35.4 °C 96 F33.8 °C 93 F26 °C 79 F31.4 °C 89 F30.2 °C 86 F25.5 °C 78 F27 °C 81 F27.4 °C 81 F Maximum: 35.4 °C = 96 F Average: 30 °C = 86 F

Power Supply (max.) 35.8 °C = 96 F | Room Temperature 22.5 °C = 73 F | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office. (+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office. (+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F (+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F. (+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.4 °C / -0.7 F).

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024
Speaker characteristics

The speakers of the Swift 5 play relatively quietly, and their sound spectrum emphasizes the higher notes. While you can still use it occasionally to reproduce media content in quiet surroundings, we recommend headphones or external speakers in the long run.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202831.1282529.835.129.83128.629.428.64026.723.526.7502526.5256320.324.220.38019.922.119.910018.219.818.212515.517.315.516016.714.516.720021.414.721.425034.515.434.531541.114.341.14004812.84850046.911.946.96304811.24880051.611.251.6100054.611.254.6125055.411.355.416005911.559200060.711.960.7250054.212.354.2315057.812.557.840005713.357500057.813.657.8630061.214.161.280006514651000060.413.760.41250064.313.664.31600062.113.562.1SPL70.924.870.9N25.10.625.1median 54.6median 13.5median 54.6Delta12.41.312.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DNApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median (+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median (±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median) Compared to same class » 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 7% worse » The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53% Compared to all devices tested » 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median (+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median (+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median) Compared to same class » 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse » The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53% Compared to all devices tested » 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

According to our measurements, the Acer Swift 5 has the lowest average performance consumption in idle operation, and with a power consumption of up to 67.2 watts under load, it is also able to lead our test field in the highest power consumption.

The included power supply is rated for a maximum power delivery of 65 watts, so it is just sufficiently dimensioned to be able to deliver the necessary power to the Acer laptop.

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE R5 4500U, Vega 6, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 14.00Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Average of class Office Power Consumption

-36%

-57%

-30%

-41%

-41%

-40%

Idle Minimum *

2.4

4.4

-83%

5

-108%

4.8

-100%

4.4

-83%

4.46 (2.3 - 15.8, n=101)

-86%

4.3 (2.2 - 9.4, n=107, last 2 years)

-79%

Idle Average *

3.5

7.7

-120%

7

-100%

6.5

-86%

7.2

-106%

7.33 (3.5 - 16.8, n=101)

-109%

7.42 (3.8 - 20.6, n=107, last 2 years)

-112%

Idle Maximum *

6.6

8.9

-35%

11

-67%

7.7

-17%

9.8

-48%

9.25 (4.5 - 17, n=101)

-40%

9.12 (4.8 - 23.9, n=107, last 2 years)

-38%

Load Average *

47

31.3

33%

54

-15%

29.6

37%

31.7

33%

36.1 (14.3 - 70, n=99)

23%

40.4 (8.7 - 75.2, n=106, last 2 years)

14%

Load Maximum *

67.2

50.6

25%

65

3%

57.8

14%

66.6

1%

61.2 (24.2 - 149, n=101)

9%

57.6 (11.1 - 107.9, n=107, last 2 years)

14%

Witcher 3 ultra *

33

39

28.6

33.3

* ... smaller is better

In our realistic WLAN test, the Swift 5 SF514 achieves a battery life of more than 13 hours. During the test, all the power saving functions, such as the variable frame rate in Intel's graphics control app, were turned off. This means that the Acer laptop makes very good use of its 56-Wh battery.

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing13h 14minWiFi Websurfing max. Brightness10h 29minLoad (maximum brightness)1h 36min

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 56 WhLenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE R5 4500U, Vega 6, 45 WhMSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52.4 WhAsus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 WhLenovo ThinkPad L13 Gen2-20VH0017GE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 46 WhAverage of class Office Battery Runtime

6%

-36%

51%

-31%

-2%

WiFi v1.3

794

487

-39%

451

-43%

786

-1%

364

-54%

596 (272 - 1715, n=107, last 2 years)

-25%

Load

96

145

51%

68

-29%

194

102%

89

-7%

116.8 (56 - 209, n=64, last 2 years)

22%

Pros

  • light and robust
  • good system performance
  • good input devices
  • Thunderbolt 4 connection

Cons

- hardly any maintenance options

- reflective touchscreen

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024
Testing the Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN. Test unit provided by Acer Germany.

The Acer Swift 5 SF514 leaves a very good impression in our test. The workmanship is of high quality, and the performance is also very well-suited for mobile operation and office, as well as browser tasks. The built-in hardware is also sufficient for simple image processing and less demanding games. In addition, the package is rounded by the very good battery life.

With the Acer Swift 5 SF514 with Tiger Lake CPU, there is nothing in the way of long lasting activities without the charger. We would have liked an alternative to the highly-reflective display, however.

Unfortunately the maintenance options turn out limited, but this also benefits the slim build. At least, you can replace the SSD and WLAN module and also clean the fan. In our opinion, the reflective display also represents a disadvantage. It is not well suited for working outdoors, and artificial light sources can also lead to annoying reflections. The antimicrobial coating is a nice gimmick, but its usefulness might be limited.

The Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN is available (in Germany) starting right now. In the US, several configurations are available at Acer, starting from $999.

Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN- 03/31/2021 v7 Mike Wobker

Pointing Device

97 / 20-75 → 100%

Application Performance

86%

Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024

Editor of the original article: Mike Faust - Senior Tech Writer - 424 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

I carried out my first IT experiments with a 386-based system and a whole 4 MB RAM. This was followed by work on various PCs and laptops that I maintained and repaired for friends and acquaintances. After training to become a Telecommunications Systems Technician and gaining a few years of experience, I graduated with a Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering. Currently, I pursue my fascination for IT, technology, and mobile devices by writing reviews and articles for Notebookcheck. I have also worked for Gamestar, Netzwelt, and Golem, among others.

Acer swift 5 14 inch review năm 2024

Having worked as a programmer for 20 years (medical devices, AI, data management systems), I've been following the computer scene for many years and especially enjoy finding out about new technology advances. Originally from Germany but living in the US, I've been working as a translator more recently, with Notebookcheck allowing me to combine my interest in new devices and translation. Other interests include Buddhism, spending time in Tibetan monasteries, and translating ancient Tibetan texts.

How good is Acer Swift 5?

The Acer Swift 5 covers all the bases with plenty of memory, storage, ports and display real estate. The 1080p webcam facilitates video conferences. Screen glare, a less-than-perfect trackpad, and significant bloatware detract from the Swift 5's otherwise solid hardware credentials.

What is the battery life of the Acer Swift 5 14?

Battery life Acer says the Swift 5's battery lasts for up to 9.5 hours on the MobileMark 2018 benchmark and up to 14 hours during web browsing or video playback with the screen set to 50 percent brightness.

Is Acer Swift 5 good for students?

In short, the Acer Swift 5 is an Ultrabook that skillfully combines portability, power, and versatility at an attractive price. It's perfect if you need a high-performance device that adapts to your busy student life.

Is Acer Swift or Aspire better?

Acer Aspire 5 (2022, Intel) Acer makes some of the best laptops, which is why Acer Swift 14 (2023) looks to be another winner thanks to the 13th-generation Intel CPUs and a boost in the webcam quality.