Nvidia quadro p2000 so sánh với 1060 6gb năm 2024

* GPU Pascal* Memory 5GB GDDR5 160bit* Memory Bandwidth 140 GB/s* CUDA Core: 1024* 3.0 TFLOPS* PCI-E x16 3.0* 4x Display Port 1.4* Maximum DP 1.4 Resolution HDR 5120 x 2880...

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280640Core clock speed1506 MHz1493 MHzBoost clock speed1708 MHz1519 MHzNumber of transistors4,400 million3,300 millionManufacturing process technology16 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)120 Watt40 WattTexture fill rate136.759.20Floating-point performance4,375 gflops1,894 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length250 mm145 mmWidth2-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GBMemory bus width192 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed8000 MHz6008 MHzMemory bandwidth192.2 GB/s80.19 GB/sShared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPortHDMI+no dataG-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+VR Ready+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)Shader Model6.46.4OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.2.1311.2CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 6 GB 26.45

+130%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 130% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1060 6 GB 10252

+130%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 130% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1060 6 GB 55893

+131%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 131% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1060 6 GB 17401

+190%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 190% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1060 6 GB 12984

+171%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 171% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1060 6 GB 77035

+151%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 151% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 144% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB by 89% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB by 844% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB by 5% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB by 62% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 113% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 135% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 54% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 135% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 144% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB by 5% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB by 89% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB by 844% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB by 62% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 113% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB outperforms Quadro P1000 by 54% in SPECviewperf 12 - Energy.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD92 45 1440p49 21−24 4K32 11

Full HD Low Preset

Cyberpunk 207740−45 18−20

Full HD Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey72

+200%

24−27

−200%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla45−50

+161%

18−20

−161%

Battlefield 5106

+172%

35−40

−172%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare78

+160%

30−33

−160%

Cyberpunk 207740−45

+144%

18−20

−144%

Far Cry 582

+156%

32

−156%

Far Cry New Dawn81

+161%

30−35

−161%

Forza Horizon 4100

+144%

40−45

−144%

Hitman 380−85

+167%

30−33

−167%

Horizon Zero Dawn55−60

+138%

24−27

−138%

Red Dead Redemption 256

+180%

20−22

−180%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider68

+183%

24−27

−183%

Watch Dogs: Legion50−55

+143%

21−24

−143%

Full HD High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey61

+154%

24−27

−154%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla45−50

+161%

18−20

−161%

Battlefield 586

+121%

35−40

−121%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare64

+113%

30−33

−113%

Cyberpunk 207740−45

+144%

18−20

−144%

Far Cry 575

+159%

29

−159%

Far Cry New Dawn75

+142%

30−35

−142%

Forza Horizon 493

+127%

40−45

−127%

Hitman 380−85

+167%

30−33

−167%

Horizon Zero Dawn55−60

+138%

24−27

−138%

Metro Exodus43

+153%

16−18

−153%

Red Dead Redemption 230

+50%

20−22

−50%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider58

+142%

24−27

−142%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt76

+153%

30

−153%

Watch Dogs: Legion50−55

+143%

21−24

−143%

Full HD Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey38

+58.3%

24−27

−58.3%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla45−50

+161%

18−20

−161%

Battlefield 578

+100%

35−40

−100%

Cyberpunk 207740−45

+144%

18−20

−144%

Far Cry 570

+159%

27

−159%

Far Cry New Dawn69

+123%

30−35

−123%

Forza Horizon 473

+78%

40−45

−78%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt44

+175%

16

−175%

Watch Dogs: Legion50−55

+143%

21−24

−143%

1440p High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare41

+141%

16−18

−141%

Hitman 345−50

+150%

18−20

−150%

Horizon Zero Dawn35−40

+106%

16−18

−106%

Metro Exodus26

+160%

10−11

−160%

Red Dead Redemption 219

+138%

8−9

−138%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider34

+127%

14−16

−127%

1440p Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey32

+191%

10−12

−191%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla27−30

+238%

8−9

−238%

Battlefield 558

+176%

21−24

−176%

Cyberpunk 207716−18

+183%

6−7

−183%

Far Cry 547

+161%

18−20

−161%

Far Cry New Dawn50

+150%

20−22

−150%

Forza Horizon 457

+171%

21−24

−171%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt30−35

+191%

10−12

−191%

Watch Dogs: Legion21−24

+250%

6−7

−250%

4K High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare22

+175%

8−9

−175%

Hitman 324−27

+127%

10−12

−127%

Horizon Zero Dawn18−20

+100%

9−10

−100%

Metro Exodus16

+220%

5−6

−220%

Red Dead Redemption 212

+100%

6−7

−100%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider17

+183%

6−7

−183%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt29

+190%

10−11

−190%

4K Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey18

+157%

7−8

−157%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla14−16

+200%

5−6

−200%

Battlefield 531

+210%

10−11

−210%

Cyberpunk 20777−8

+250%

2−3

−250%

Far Cry 523

+156%

9−10

−156%

Far Cry New Dawn26

+117%

12−14

−117%

Forza Horizon 438

+153%

14−16

−153%

Watch Dogs: Legion12−14

+200%

4−5

−200%


This is how GTX 1060 6 GB and Quadro P1000 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1060 6 GB is 104% faster than Quadro P1000

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1060 6 GB is 133% faster than Quadro P1000

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1060 6 GB is 191% faster than Quadro P1000

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1060 6 GB is 250% faster than the Quadro P1000.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1060 6 GB surpassed Quadro P1000 in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 26.45 11.50 Recency 19 July 2016 1 February 2017 Cost $299 $375 Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 40 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is a desktop card while Quadro P1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Quadro P1000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

Nvidia quadro p2000 so sánh với 1060 6gb năm 2024

Nvidia quadro p2000 so sánh với 1060 6gb năm 2024

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Nvidia quadro p2000 so sánh với 1060 6gb năm 2024

Nvidia quadro p2000 so sánh với 1060 6gb năm 2024

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.