What is one difference between psychoanalytic and psychodynamic approaches to therapy?
Psychodynamic ApproachBy Saul McLeod, updated 2020 Show
Take-home Messages
His theories are clinically derived - i.e., based on what his patients told him during therapy. The psychodynamic therapist would usually be treating the patient for depression or anxiety related disorders. Basic AssumptionsOur behavior and feelings are powerfully affected by unconscious motives: The unconscious mind comprises mental processes that are inaccessible to consciousness but that influence judgments, feelings, or behavior (Wilson, 2002). According to Freud (1915), the unconscious mind is the primary source of human behavior. Like an iceberg, the most important part of the mind is the part you cannot see. Our feelings, motives, and decisions are actually powerfully influenced by our past experiences, and stored in the unconscious. Our behavior and feelings as adults (including psychological problems) are rooted in our childhood experiences: Psychodynamic theory states that events in our childhood have a great influence on our adult lives, shaping our personality. Events that occur in childhood can remain in the unconscious, and cause problems as adults. Personality is shaped as the drives are modified by different conflicts at different times in childhood (during psychosexual development). All behavior has a cause (usually unconscious), even slips of the tongue. Therefore all behavior is determined: Psychodynamic theory is strongly determinist as it views our behavior as caused entirely by unconscious factors over which we have no control. Unconscious thoughts and feelings can transfer to the conscious mind in the form of parapraxes, popularly known as Freudian slips or slips of the tongue. We reveal what is really on our mind by saying something we didn't mean to. Freud believed that slips of the tongue provided an insight into the unconscious mind and that there were no accidents, every behavior (including slips of the tongue) was significant (i.e., all behavior is determined). Personality is made up of three parts (i.e., tripartite): the id, ego, and super-ego: The id is the primitive and instinctive component of personality. It consists of all the inherited (i.e., biological) components of personality present at birth, including the sex (life) instinct – Eros (which contains the libido), and the aggressive (death) instinct - Thanatos. The ego develops in order to mediate between the unrealistic id and the external real world. It is the decision making component of personality. The superego incorporates the values and morals of society which are learned from one's parents and others. Parts of the unconscious mind (the id and superego) are in constant conflict with the conscious part of the mind (the ego). This conflict creates anxiety, which could be dealt with by the ego’s use of defense mechanisms. The History of Psychodynamic Theory
Psychodynamic Approach SummaryMethodology / Studies Methodology / StudiesBasic Assumptions Basic AssumptionsThe major causes of behavior have their origin in the unconscious. Psychic determinism: all behavior has a cause/reason. Different parts of the unconscious mind are in constant struggle. Our behavior and feelings as adults (including psychological problems) are rooted in our childhood experiences. Areas of Application Areas of ApplicationStrengths StrengthsIt has given rise to one of the first “talking cure,” psychoanalysis, on which many psychological therapies are now based. It could be argued that Freud was the first person to highlights the importance of childhood in mental health and this is an idea extensively used today. The Psychodynamic approach takes into account both sides of the Nature/Nurture debate. Freud claimed that adult personality is the product of innate drives- i.e., natural motivations or urges we are born with- and childhood experiences- i.e., the way we are raised and nurtured. Limitations LimitationsIgnores mediational processes (e.g., thinking) The psychodynamic approach places too much emphasis on the psychological factors, without considering the biological/genetic factors that influence and contribute to mental health problems. Too deterministic (little free-will) Unfalsifiable (difficult to prove wrong) Case Studies - Subjective / Cannot generalize results Simplifying the human mind into the id, ego, and superego and the five psychosexual stages make the approach reductionist. Issues and DebatesFree will vs DeterminismIt is strongly determinist as it views our behavior as caused entirely by unconscious factors over which we have no control. Nature vs NurtureThe psychodynamic approach recognises the influence of social factors as it argues that we are driven by innate biological instincts, represented by the Id (nature), but the ways these instincts are expressed is shaped by our social and cultural environment (nurture). Holism vs ReductionismThe psychodynamic approach is determinist as it rejects the idea of free will. A person’s behavior is determined by their unconscious motives which are shaped by their biological drives and their early experiences. Idiographic vs NomotheticFreud argued that human behavior is governed by universal processes that apply to everyone e.g. the tripartite structure of the mind (nomothetic). However, he also proposed that the ways in which these processes manifest themselves in the individual is unique (idiographic). Are the research methods used scientific?The concepts proposed by Freud cannot be tested empirically. The theory is not falsifiable as if people behave in the way predicted by the theory it is viewed as support, if they don’t it is argued that they are using defence mechanisms. Critical EvaluationThe psychodynamic approach has given rise to one of the first “talking cure", psychoanalysis, on which many psychological therapies are now based. Psychoanalysis is rarely used now in its original form but it is still used in a shorter version in some cases. The greatest criticism of the psychodynamic approach is that it is unscientific in its analysis of human behavior. Many of the concepts central to Freud's theories are subjective, and as such, difficult to test scientifically. For example, how is it possible to scientifically study concepts like the unconscious mind or the tripartite personality? In this respect, it could be argued that the psychodynamic perspective is unfalsifiable as its theories cannot be empirically investigated. However, cognitive psychology has identified unconscious processes, such as procedural memory (Tulving, 1972), automatic processing (Bargh & Chartrand, 1999; Stroop, 1935), and social psychology have shown the importance of implicit processing (Greenwald & Banaji, 1995). Such empirical findings have demonstrated the role of unconscious processes in human behavior. Kline (1989) argues that psychodynamic theory comprises a series of hypotheses, some of which are more easily tested than others, and some with more supporting evidence than others. Also, while the theories of the psychodynamic approach may not be easily tested, this does not mean that it does not have strong explanatory power. Nevertheless, most of the evidence for psychodynamic theories is taken from Freud's case studies (e.g., Little Hans, Anna O). The main problem here is that the case studies are based on studying one person in detail, and with reference to Freud, the individuals in question are most often middle-aged women from Vienna (i.e., his patients). This makes generalizations to the wider population (e.g., the whole world) difficult. Another problem with the case study method is that it is susceptible to researcher bias. Reexamination of Freud's own clinical work suggests that he sometimes distorted his patients' case histories to 'fit' with his theory (Sulloway, 1991). The humanistic approach makes the criticism that the psychodynamic perspective is too deterministic. Freud suggests that all thoughts, behaviors and emotions are determined by our childhood experiences and unconscious mental processes. This is a weakness because it suggests we have no conscious free will over our behavior, leaving little room for the idea of personal agency (i.e., free will). Finally, the psychodynamic approach can be criticized for being sexist against women. For example, Freud believed that females' penis envy made them inferiour to males. He also thought that females tended to develop weaker superegos and to be more prone to anxiety than males. Is there a difference between psychodynamic and psychoanalytic?The words psychodynamic and psychoanalytic are often confused. Remember that Freud’s theories were psychoanalytic, whereas the term ‘psychodynamic’ refers to both his theories and those of his followers. What is psychodynamic in simple terms?Sigmund Freud highlights the role of the unconscious mind, the structure of personality and the influence that childhood experiences have on later life. Freud believed that the unconscious mind determines most of our behavior and that we are motivated by unconscious emotional drives. How to reference this article:How to reference this article:McLeod, S. A. (2017). Psychodynamic approach. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/psychodynamic.html APA Style ReferencesAdler, A. (1927). Understanding human nature. New York: Greenburg. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American psychologist, 54(7), 462. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton. Freud, A. (1936). Ego & the mechanisms of defense. Freud, S., & Breuer. J. (1895). Studies on hysteria. In Standard edition (Vol. 2, pp. 1–335). Freud, S. (1896). Heredity and the etiology of the neuroses. In Standard edition (Vol. 3, pp. 142–156). Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. In Standard edition (Vols. 4 & 5, pp. 1–627). Freud, S. (1909). Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. In Standard edition (Vol. 10, pp. 153–249). Freud, S. (1909). Analysis of a phobia of a five year old boy. In The Pelican Freud Library (1977), Vol 8, Case Histories 1, pages 169-306. Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. SE, 14: 159-204. Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms off Defense. International Universities Press, Inc. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological review, 102(1), 4. Jung, C. G. (1907). Ueber die Psychologie der Dementia praecox. Psychological Bulletin, 4(6), 196-197. Jung, C. G. (1912). Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido: Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Denkens. F. Deuticke. Jung, C. G., et al. (1964). Man and his Symbols, New York, N.Y.: Anchor Books, Doubleday. Kline, P. (1989). Objective tests of Freud's theories. Psychology Survey, 7, 127-45. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of experimental psychology, 18(6), 643. Sulloway, F. J. (1991). Reassessing Freud's case histories: The social construction of psychoanalysis. Isis, 82(2), 245-275. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of Memory, (pp. 381–403). New York: Academic Press. Wilson, T. D. (2004). Strangers to ourselves. Harvard University Press. How to reference this article:How to reference this article:McLeod, S. A. (2017). Psychodynamic approach. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/psychodynamic.html Home | About Us | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Contact Us Simply Psychology's content is for informational and educational purposes only. Our website is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. © Simply Scholar Ltd - All rights reserved What is the difference between psychoanalytic and psychodynamic therapy?Psychodynamic therapy evolved from psychoanalytic therapy and seeks to discover how unconscious thoughts affect current behaviour. Psychodynamic therapy usually focuses on more immediate problems and attempts to provide a quicker solution.
What is the difference between psychoanalysis and psychotherapy?Psychotherapy attempts to restore a persons relationship to the social norms and regulations, while psychoanalysis works to restore a person's relationship to their sexuality. Psychotherapy works to strengthen the ego, while psychoanalysis works to strengthen the subject's relationship to their own unconscious.
|