What was the relationship between China and nomadic groups?

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Log in through your institution

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $22.00 USD.

How does it work?

  1. Select the purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

journal article

The Impact of China's Reform Policy on the Nomads of Western Tibet

Asian Survey

Vol. 29, No. 6 (Jun., 1989)

, pp. 619-641 (23 pages)

Published By: University of California Press

https://doi.org/10.2307/2644756

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2644756

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

Purchase article

$22.00 - Download now and later

Journal Information

The only bimonthly academic journal of contemporary Asian affairs published in the US, Asian Survey provides in-depth analysis on contemporary Asia and international affairs. For over forty years, academics, government and security officials, business executives, and journalists have relied on Asian Survey to keep them well informed on a broad spectrum of current Asian issues and developments. Leading American and international scholars provide readers with authoritative reviews and analyses concerning the politics, economics, and foreign relations of countries east of Afghanistan to the Pacific Rim. In each issue, contributors offer valuable "insider perspectives" on important current events, making Asian Survey one of the most widely read and quoted sources for developments in Asia. Scholarly analysis and commentary offer strategies for the future, and timely special issues focus on areas of crisis and change.

Publisher Information

Founded in 1893, University of California Press, Journals and Digital Publishing Division, disseminates scholarship of enduring value. One of the largest, most distinguished, and innovative of the university presses today, its collection of print and online journals spans topics in the humanities and social sciences, with concentrations in sociology, musicology, history, religion, cultural and area studies, ornithology, law, and literature. In addition to publishing its own journals, the division also provides traditional and digital publishing services to many client scholarly societies and associations.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Asian Survey © 1989 University of California Press
Request Permissions

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Log in through your institution

journal article

Early Chinese Settlement Policies towards the Nomads

Asia Major

THIRD SERIES, Vol. 5, No. 2 (1992)

, pp. 41-77 (37 pages)

Published By: Academia Sinica

https://www.jstor.org/stable/41625264

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

Journal Information

Asia Major was founded in Germany in 1923 by Bruno Schindler, and soon became the leading German outlet for scholarship on East Asia. The rise of National Socialism forced Dr. Schindler, who was Jewish, to leave Germany, thus ending the original series. In 1949, Schindler revived the journal in a "New Series" in England. The new series came to an end in 1975, the victim of economic difficulties. In 1988, Denis Twitchett revived the journal in its "Third Series" in the United States. It moved to the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan in 1998, where it is currently based. In response to the growth of East Asian studies, the Third Series focuses solely on China, covering all periods of Chinese history, literature, ideas and culture. Included are the histories and cultures of other East and Central Asian peoples in their relations with China. The journal is issued semi-annually.

Publisher Information

The Institute of History and Philology (IHP), Academia Sinica is one of the most accomplished research institutions in the international Chinese studies community. Founded by Fu Ssu-nien in 1929 in Canton, it moved to Peking in 1929 and then on to Nan-ching in 1934. By the beginning of the Sino-Japanese War, IHP had won worldwide acclaim for its scholarly accomplishments. The archaeological excavation of Yin-hsü in An-yang, He-nan province, patently marked the beginning of a new era in the study of Chinese antiquity. IHP settled at its current location in Taipei in 1954. It now consists of four departments: history, archaeology, anthropology, and philology, and also holds a library and two museums. The publications of IHP includes The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Asia Major, Disquisitions on the Past and Present, and special topic monographs, archaeological reports, and collections of historical documents, totaling one thousand volumes.  

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Asia Major © 1992 Academia Sinica
Request Permissions

How did nomadic people affect China?

Moreover, nomads presided over the Silk Roads, the vast network of trade routes that spanned the Asian continent. In fact, the Silk Roads began in trade between China and the steppe to supply China with horses. Throughout the history of overland trade, the nomads played a key role.

What was the relationship between nomadic peoples and settled societies?

The relationship between nomads and the settled civilizations that surrounded this vast land was one of commerce as well as warfare. The nomads' trade was not based on gain but rather on providing themselves with goods they did not produce.

When did the nomads invade China?

Hun Origin. No one knows exactly where the Huns came from. Some scholars believe they originated from the nomad Xiongnu people who entered the historical record in 318 B.C. and terrorized China during the Qin Dynasty and during the later Han Dynasty.

Why might nomads and settled communities have conflict?

Being settled meant being tied to land and possessions; being nomadic meant having a mobile community with a mobile food supply. This allowed nomads to attack and plunder resources. They could gain access to agricultural products without having to farm or trade. Of course, this angered settled communities.